Uncover
We are a group of changemakers who believe that seeing is the first step to change. When animal welfare content is suppressed or sidelined, we rely on our contributor network and cross‑border information sharing to open a window of truth for All readers.
我们是一群相信“看见”是改变起点的行动者。当动物权益内容因各种原因无法被广泛传播时，我们选择用投稿人网络和跨境信息搬运，为读者打开一扇真实的窗。
OUR STORY
Animal-related news and reports emerge daily across the globe. Yet many critical stories remain hidden—either due to online censorship or conflicts with commercial interests, trapping the public inside algorithm‑driven information cocoons. Especially in China due to the isolated network.
We are here to break through. Through contributions from our community members, we unearth under‑reported animal welfare issues, and we actively translate and redistribute reliable overseas coverage for Chinese‑speaking audiences.
Beyond aggregation, Animal Echo filters the noise, identifies key facts, clarifies event timelines, and tracks developments—so that every reader can gain a thorough, efficient, and unbiased understanding of each story.
全球动物相关新闻与事件层出不穷，而其中许多关键信息，或因网络管控，或因与资本利益冲突，难以被大众触及。大众往往被困于由算法与商业逻辑构筑的信息茧房之中。
我们致力于打破这一壁垒：通过社区投稿人的力量，挖掘被遮蔽的动物权益真相；同时持续编译并呈现境外权威信息，为中文互联网用户提供真实、全面的视野。
Animal Echo 不满足于信息堆砌，而是专注于 筛选核心事实、梳理事件脉络、追踪进展节点，让每一位读者都能用最少的时间，掌握最完整的真相。
Speak
Take Action with Animal Echo
In the face of habitat destruction, encroachment on protected areas, or acts of animal cruelty, silence is not an option. Animal Echo goes beyond reporting—we equip you with practical tools for action. We provide ready‑to‑use templates for complaint letters and public opinion submissions, along with up‑to‑date contact emails for relevant authorities, organizations, and corporations. We don’t speak on your behalf—we make sure that when you choose to speak, you have the template, the address, and the confidence to be heard.
Animal Echo 的行动支持
面对破坏动物栖息地、侵占生态保护区、虐待动物等恶性事件，沉默不是选项。Animal Echo 不仅报道，更提供切实的行动工具——我们为你准备举报信与意见信模板，并整理涉事机构、主管部门及相关企业的联系邮箱，帮助你以最快、最有效的方式，将你的声音直接送达决策者手中。我们不替你做选择，但确保你每一次发声都有章可循、有路可通。
Incidents
A Highway vs. a Critically Endangered Bird
(Spoon-billed Sandpiper)
A Highway vs. a Critically Endangered Bird
Beihai, April 30, 2026 — The EIA for the G228 Guangxi Coastal Highway (Dafengjiang–Gaode Section) was approved today. The planned route will cut through the key wintering habitat of the Spoon-billed Sandpiper, occupying approximately 24.28 hectares, including 8.45 hectares of ecological protection red line.
With a global population of only 300–700 individuals, the Spoon-billed Sandpiper is listed as "Critically Endangered" by the IUCN. The Dafengjiang estuary tidal flat in Hepu, Guangxi, is one of its most stable wintering sites in China, hosting about 3% of the world's population.
In early April, after the EIA public notice, environmental NGO "Friends of Nature" submitted objections, arguing the project violates the Wildlife Protection Law and requesting disapproval. On April 30, the Beihai Administrative Approval Bureau granted the approval, rejecting those recommendations.
Once again, development has prevailed over conservation.
一条公路与一只极危候鸟的冲突
2026年4月30日，北海——G228广西滨海公路工程（大风江至高德段）环评今日获批。规划路线将穿越极危物种勺嘴鹬的关键越冬栖息地，占用约24.28公顷，其中生态保护红线8.45公顷。
勺嘴鹬全球仅存300–700只，被IUCN列为“极危”等级。广西合浦大风江入海口滩涂是其在中国最稳定的越冬地之一，承载全球约3%的种群。
4月初，环评公示后，环保组织“自然之友”等提交反对意见，指项目涉嫌违反《野生动物保护法》，请求不予批准。4月30日，北海市行政审批局批复同意，未采纳上述建议。
发展与保护之间的天平，这一次倾向了工程
Speak for tehm!
Copyable tip-off letter in Chinese 举报信 关于G228广西滨海公路工程违法占用极危物种勺嘴鹬栖息地的举报 致：国家林业和草原局、生态环境部、中央生态环境保护督察办公室 举报事项： G228丹东至东兴广西滨海公路工程（大风江至高德段）环评已于2026年4月30日获批，但规划路线直接穿越极危物种勺嘴鹬（全球仅存300–700只）的关键越冬栖息地，涉嫌违反《野生动物保护法》和《湿地保护法》。 核心事实： 项目占用勺嘴鹬重要栖息地约24.28公顷，其中生态保护红线8.45公顷； 该区域位于东亚—澳大利西亚迁飞区关键节点，承载全球约3% 勺嘴鹬种群； 2026年5月，中央生态环保督察介入后，广西生态环境厅已认定原环评结论“科学性不足”，并决定暂停工程建设、要求重新选线。 请求： 责令项目在完成科学选线论证前不得复工； 依法撤销环评批复，要求路线无条件完全避让勺嘴鹬栖息地及生态红线； 调查原环评审批过程是否存在违规行为。 恳请贵部门坚守生态优先底线，守护这一濒危物种的最后栖息地。 此致 敬礼 举报人：一位关注生态保护的公民 日期：2026年8月9日
Competent Authority / Recipient
Tel: +86 0779-3969722
Email: jsgck2018@163.com
(Public notice originally published at: http://www.beihai.gov.cn/xxgkbm/bhsxzspj/ztz1_31/xzxkgs_188594/)
Update
2026-05-01 Central Ecological and Environmental Protection Inspection Team (5th Group) arrived in Guangxi; the project was listed as a key supervised case through public reports
2026-05-25 Guangxi Department of Ecology and Environment held a remediation work meeting, conveyed the autonomous region's decision to suspend construction, and ordered re-evaluation of route selection, noting that the original EIA conclusion on impacts to spoon-billed sandpiper habitat was "scientifically insufficient"
Sand Martins Died from Industrial Sand Extraction: The Sand Martin Deaths at Sand Quarry in Mianyang, Sichuan
In early March 2026, a video showed dead sand martins at a sand quarry in Mianyang, with some birds pinned beneath rocks. The sand martin is a nationally protected species, and the quarry had become a breeding site.
On March 9, the Mianyang Forestry Bureau announced: over 700 nests confirmed, deaths not exceeding 10; cause attributed to rain and wind causing natural collapse; intentional human destruction ruled out.
Questions:
-
Sand martins nest only in near-vertical sandy cliffs, highly sensitive to surrounding disturbances.
-
The quarry continuously removed sand for construction — as lower layers were excavated, the upper nesting section lost support and collapsed. The sand martins died precisely because of industrial sand extraction.
-
Birds pinned under rocks contradict the "natural collapse" theory, more consistent with mechanical operations or collapse after sand removal.
2026年3月初，网友视频显示绵阳一处沙场出现多只崖沙燕尸体，部分被石块压住。崖沙燕为国家“三有”保护动物，该沙场是其筑巢繁殖地。
3月9日，绵阳市林业局通报：确认两处沙场共有崖沙燕巢穴700余个，死亡不超过10只，非网传“成百上千”；死因为降雨、大风致自然垮塌，排除人为蓄意破坏。
质疑：
-
崖沙燕仅选择近90度垂直沙质崖壁筑巢，结构极其敏感。周边动工即可改变受力结构引发垮塌。
-
沙场因建筑需要持续外运沙子——下层沙被挖走，上层巢穴失去支撑后崩落。沙燕正是死于工业移沙。
-
网传视频中多只崖沙燕被石块压住，与“自然垮塌”矛盾，更符合机械作业或沙层抽走后的大面积崩落。
Speak for tehm!
Copyable tip-off letter in Chinese 举报信 关于绵阳市涪城区、游仙区沙场崖沙燕死亡的举报 致：绵阳市林业局、四川省林业和草原局、国家林业和草原局 举报事项： 2026年3月初，绵阳市涪城区新皂镇和游仙区小枧镇两处沙场出现崖沙燕死亡，视频显示多只崖沙燕被石块压住。崖沙燕为国家“三有”保护动物，两处共有巢穴700余个。 绵阳市林业局3月9日通报称，死亡不超过10只，死因为降雨大风致自然垮塌，排除人为蓄意破坏。但该结论存在诸多疑点： 一、“排除人为”依据不足。 崖沙燕仅选择近90度垂直的沙质崖壁筑巢，结构极其敏感，周边动工即可改变受力结构引发垮塌。通报仅以“未在巢穴正上方作业”排除人为因素，未考虑整体结构影响。 二、工业移沙即破坏结构。 沙场因建筑需要持续外运沙子，下层沙被挖走后，上方巢穴失去支撑崩落——沙燕正是死于工业移沙。官方通报对此避而不谈。 三、石块压鸟与“自然垮塌”矛盾。 视频中鸟类被石块压住，更符合机械作业或沙层抽走后的大面积崩落，而非沙粒滑落的自然垮塌。 请求： 由市级以上主管部门牵头，开展独立、透明的第三方调查，重新核查死因及与工业移沙的因果关系； 在崖沙燕繁育期内，暂停两处沙场的工业移沙作业，确保剩余700余巢穴安全； 公布调查结果，如存在违规行为依法追责
Competent Authority / Recipient:
Tel: + 86 028-83235909
Email for Feedback: sclcxxbs@163.com
Update
30 Belugas on the Brink: Marineland's "Euthanasia Blackmail"
Marineland — a defunct theme park in Niagara Falls, Canada — is on the verge of bankruptcy and has threatened to euthanize approximately 30 beluga whales in its care unless the federal government provides emergency funding by a specified deadline. The park ceased operations in 2024 and is insolvent. According to The Canadian Press, at least 19 belugas and 1 killer whale have died at the park since 2019. Former trainers have gone public: pool walls are peeling, paint chips float in the water, filtration systems frequently fail, only 18 staff care for two large beluga pools, and full-time trainers earn just $18.50 CAD/hour.
Canada passed the Ending the Captivity of Whales and Dolphins Act in 2019, banning commercial breeding, performances, and strictly restricting imports/exports. Marineland attempted to sell the whales to Chimelong Ocean Kingdom in China, but the Fisheries Minister rejected the plan, citing unwillingness to "perpetuate their exploitation." Marineland is effectively holding animal lives hostage — when profits dry up, they use euthanasia as bargaining leverage. But these 30 lives are real. Since Canada permits no new commercial captivity, the most humane path forward is allowing export to qualified institutions or having the government purchase and relocate them to ocean sanctuaries, rather than letting them perish in bureaucratic gridlock.
加拿大尼亚加拉瀑布的Marineland海洋公园濒临破产，声称若联邦政府未在指定日期前提供资金援助，将对园内约30头白鲸实施安乐死。公园已于2024年停业，早已资不抵债。据加拿大通讯社统计，自2019年以来，园内已有至少19头白鲸及1头虎鲸死亡。前驯养员公开爆料：水池池壁涂层大面积剥落，漆面碎屑漂浮水中，水体循环系统频繁故障，18名工作人员需兼顾两处大型饲养池，全职驯养员时薪仅18.5加元。
加拿大2019年已通过《终止圈养鲸鱼和海豚法案》，禁止鲸类商业繁殖与表演，并严格限制进出口。园方曾试图将白鲸出售至中国珠海长隆，被渔业部长以“不愿让白鲸终身圈养”为由驳回。Marineland本质上是利用动物生命绑架政府决策——公园不赚钱了，便以安乐死为筹码反复扯皮。但30条生命是实打实的。鉴于加拿大不再允许新的商业圈养，最人道的解决路径应是开放出口许可让专业机构接收，或由政府出资买下鲸鱼安置于海洋庇护区，而非任其在推诿中耗尽生机。
Speak for tehm!
Copyable tip-off letter in Chinese 举报信 关于加拿大Marineland海洋公园以30头白鲸生命威胁政府、违反动物福利的投诉 致：加拿大渔业与海洋部（Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada） 投诉事项： Marineland海洋公园停业后濒临破产，以对园内约30头白鲸实施安乐死为威胁，要求联邦政府提供资金援助。公园利用动物生命与政府博弈，严重违反动物福利基本准则。 事实依据： 圈养环境恶劣：Marineland自2019年以来已有19头白鲸死亡。前员工指认水池维护严重不足，池壁涂层剥落，水质堪忧；18名工作人员需兼顾两处饲养池，时薪仅18.5加元，无法保障基本养护。 法律与道德矛盾：加拿大2019年通过《终止圈养鲸豚法案》，禁止商业圈养与繁殖，却未制定存量动物的退出安置机制。公园利用这一法律空白，以安乐死威胁政府。 出口审查双标：渔业部以“不让白鲸终身圈养”为由驳回对华出口，却批准向美国出口——这些白鲸进入美国水族馆后同样将被终身圈养，审查标准前后矛盾。 用生命做筹码：公园以安乐死为要挟反复向政府施压，实质是勒索。 请求： 暂停Marineland所有出口审批，直至独立第三方对白鲸健康状况完成全面评估； 由政府出资，将鲸群转移至海洋庇护区，或由具备资质的专业机构接收安置； 追究Marineland管理层以动物生命威胁政府的法律责任； 修订《终止圈养鲸豚法案》，补充存量动物退出安置机制，杜绝此类事件再次发生。
Competent Authority / Recipient:
Tel: 1-877-722-8949 (toll‑free within Canada)
1-613-993-0999 (outside Canada)
Email: info@dfo-mpo.gc.ca
Online complaint form: https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/contact/feedback-retroaction-eng.htm
Minister’s Office: Minister.Joanne.Thompson@dfo-mpo.gc.ca
Update
DR. EMILY FOSTER
Emily conducts research on climate impacts and informs our strategies with her scientific expertise.
Environment Scientist
We embrace an inclusive, collaborative approach. Addressing climate change requires diverse perspectives and joint efforts. Our strategy integrates technology, education, and community involvement for lasting impact.
